Replies to post #284635 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[The Canes]

Do you know if we received an offer for our company? Or are you speculating?

[Biobillionair]

I love-

If the high level consensus had always been, that Amarin's patents were a coinflip from infringement or a patent loss, Amarin would have been "negligent" for not selling after receiving the Marine label in the first place. Am I to believe, that Amarin embarked on Reduce-it, assuming that although they understood their patents weren't airtight, that they just assumed, they would settle cases for years to come? Come on man! Really?

You ask the wrong questions. R-I patents being properly tied to Marine patents via ANCHOR label would have bolstered strength of claims construction in Marine case.

Taking Du court to decision was a strategic mistake*. Prosecuting First Amendment case instead of prosecuting SPA appeal was a mistake. Flipping coin on an appeal decision is reckless.

Great drug, poor business strategy.

*Amarin admits they thought they would win; clearly a good faith effort to settle was not explored

Is Amarin legally required to negotiate in good faith? I say yes.

BB