InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,718.57
(
0.28%
)
US TECH 100
19,385.20
(
0.33%
)
Dow Jones
42,124.65
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
74.92
(
1.60%
)
Bitcoin
63,643.55
(
0.50%
)

Replies to post #284300 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

Replies to #284300 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)
icon url

Meowza

07/02/20 7:14 PM

#284302 RE: Bouf #284300

Why risk invalidity decisions? Why have district courts?
icon url

Whalatane

07/02/20 7:17 PM

#284303 RE: Bouf #284300

Bouf. What settlement would have been acceptable to you before the trial .... and what would it be now ?
Kiwi
icon url

postes

07/02/20 7:45 PM

#284308 RE: Bouf #284300

Bouf...spot on..I agree on all counts.
icon url

marjac

07/02/20 9:04 PM

#284327 RE: Bouf #284300

Beautiful, Bouf. Just beautiful. You make me proud.
icon url

Biobillionair

07/02/20 10:59 PM

#284349 RE: Bouf #284300

Agree Bouf, likely arrogance and greed of quick sale. BB
icon url

rafunrafun

07/03/20 1:13 AM

#284352 RE: Bouf #284300

You cannot blame Amarin if you do not know what the other side was willing to accept (if anything), and you do not know that.

If H & R said that they would only settle if they can enter the market on January 1, 2025, and that is not negotiable, would you want Amarin to take that deal? I hope you would not.

Same with the buyout. What if BP said that until the court validates the patent, they won't pay more than $10 billion ... or $20 billion after the win. Did you want Amarin selling for $10 billion, when their MC was almost that after the FDA approval?