InvestorsHub Logo

sentiment_stocks

06/26/20 3:00 AM

#291886 RE: Doc logic #291876

Thanks Doc, I understand... the issue is that they didn’t write “more likely than not” but instead wrote “not more likely than not”... so given that, they think it’s more likely that they will end up paying something than not, not that it’s not more likely than not that they will not pay, lol. :)

CogDiss 1188X

06/26/20 11:47 AM

#291974 RE: Doc logic #291876

DL, I believe you have decoded the riddle correctly. The fact that they saw fit to include such an obvious monstrosity in a PR signals an amused contempt for its readers.