InvestorsHub Logo

MontanaState83

06/06/20 8:34 AM

#278397 RE: alm2 #278384

Let’s not forget the fact that Mori did not even study TG>500. Surprised Bhatt did not give that a “by the way”.

The glaring errors in DU’s decision are becoming too numerous to count. The only remaining question is whether the CAFC judges believe in justice

Bouf

06/06/20 8:48 AM

#278398 RE: alm2 #278384

It may be more of a question whether the new information from the JAMAICA article is an opinion or new scientific fact. If the former it will be much harder to get the CTA to accept a new opinion as to the limits of the Mori analysis, but if the latter, the CTA will be more open to receiving new scientific facts that were not known at the time of trial.

I don’t know enough about statistics to tell the difference here, but would love to hear other thoughts as I study up.