Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[alm2]

Explanation to FC -Singers obvious point I will be - the statistical error in the Mori study has only come to light since the DC trial was concluded.

Let us say the principle fact in a litigation case was that the world is flat - after the trial clear incontrovertible evidence proves the fact that the world is round and the original study upon which the flat world was based was thus clearly erroneous
Does the original decision stand on appeal.? Because the new agreed fact -a round world -is not admissible ?
There will be a way in to the appeal for correction of clear error ... do the generics fly in the face of the new evidence - still claiming the world is flat based on what is obvious earlier error ? Before the FC ?- lawyers will never make fools of themselves in the eyes of an appeal court by claiming an erroneous fact is true
The issue may be however - is there clear and indisputable (by anyone/by the generics) error in the statistical analysis contained within Mori ?
The generics may worm away at not accepting there is such error
The new Bhatt evidence best be absolutely right !!!
Alm