InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

MontanaState83

05/25/20 3:30 PM

#276192 RE: Whalatane #276187

Kiwi - You should testify at the appeal, if only... what do you think odds of appeal win are? Very disturbing that it is dependent on which judges rather than truth.

Tough to say on valuation as I have no idea of EU revenues
icon url

jessellivermore

05/25/20 8:37 PM

#276243 RE: Whalatane #276187

Kiwi...

There was absolutely no evidence. Suggesting the medical community or the FDA or the USPTO...Thought EPA was an obvious as a cure for Acute Pancreatitis or atherosclerotic In the 2008-2010 period..EPA had virtually no fans..

I began to get the idea back in 2010. Not from my knowledge of lipids or CVD..But my background in Systemic Inflammation and that was from my close association and being the clinical adviser to a group of scientists at Harvard that were working on ideas to control inflammation..

I felt the jump from lipids gumming up the arteries like sludge in a sewer pipe might have thrown a lot of people off and the possibility that the real issue was damage to the arteries from inflammation and knew that EPA and the EPA/AA controlled Systemic inflammation in the Eicosanoid system..The problem there was not a lot of interest in the medical schools on the Eicosanoid System. Medical students and clinicians knew very little other than names like "Prostagladins..But the the whole topic was mainly a medical scientist thing..The clincians did not know the science and the Scientists did not know clinical impact..

So it was like the A-Bomb explosion at Trinity...Einstein might have predicted the mega effects of losing a small amount of matter in the fusion trial...But nobody thought it was obvious the bomb would explode the way it did until Trinity...After the explosion..Then it was obvious"...

The 2018 R-I trial results of the Vascepa were the Trinity explosion..The EPA's effects became Obvious..But not before.

":>) JL