InvestorsHub Logo

HinduKush

05/22/20 10:50 AM

#275520 RE: zmanindc #275518

This is a great idea

dukesking

05/22/20 11:04 AM

#275529 RE: zmanindc #275518

Zmanindc, sign me up. Great work. I view Hatch-Waxman as a very serious threat to innovation in the US. HW needs an overhaul or full repeal. The biggest thing I’ve learned by being an AMRN investor is that HW is destructive to American innovation, jobs, health, and security. HW must be repealed or overhauled and innovators need to be guaranteed exclusivity without the threat of nonstop litigation and threats to IP. Thank you for your efforts.

Restingzebra

05/22/20 11:22 AM

#275536 RE: zmanindc #275518

Eyxcellent! Well done. Thank you.

ilovetech

05/22/20 11:32 AM

#275543 RE: zmanindc #275518

Zman., "Promises made promises kept." Thanks for delivering!

ILT

berryfitRD

05/22/20 7:49 PM

#275699 RE: zmanindc #275518

I am on board. Thank you.

The Irishman

05/22/20 8:49 PM

#275704 RE: zmanindc #275518

zmanindc:
This is what I’m talking about. If you believe, then you must fight.
Appreciate this very much.

sts66

05/23/20 3:49 PM

#275864 RE: zmanindc #275518

Nice ideas, but I see some immediate problems:

1. The price control issue - companies would have incentive to start with a very high price so the limitation of linking price increases to the CPI is bypassed.

a) if they do that, they risk not getting enough patients on the drug because cost is too high - V was priced low to encourage uptake while we waited for R-IT results.

b) companies would not be able to raise prices to increase profits in order to develop new indications and drugs.

c) The CPI is a garbage number and everyone knows it does not represent actual inflation.

2. The "Consumer Pricing and Protection Provision" is DOA - imposing coverage requirements and price controls on commercial insurers is unconstitutional - the HHS has limited ability to require coverage of certain drugs for Medicare plans because it's a government insurance plan funded by taxpayers, but in general they cannot force Part D providers to cover specific drugs. Heck, this applies to (1) too - drug price controls - Congress and BP will never allow it, especially linking prices to government subsidized drug coverage in the EU.