If resolving this VALID revocation case were a slam dunk, as has been suggested, it would have been settled long ago!
The reason this case is taking so long is because the judge made an incorrect sentencing based on prior case law...
Finding the company guilty, yet letting them off the hook without punishment, was simply a rogue ruling, and the SEC knows this!
At this point, I suspect that the SEC has no choice but to overturn the judge's sentence, or lack thereof, and order either revocation, or a lesser sentence...
If they were simply going to uphold the judge's ruling, it would have been over long ago...