InvestorsHub Logo

iwasadiver

05/01/20 11:25 PM

#281031 RE: JerryCampbell #281026

No, she’s smart as hell and we’re going to see that these past toxic financiers are getting squeezed out of their warrants. Wouldn’t be surprised if some really good news comes out next week.

OilPatch

05/02/20 4:26 AM

#281044 RE: JerryCampbell #281026

LP was an exec at ENRON right?

Looking4aprofit

05/02/20 4:50 AM

#281046 RE: JerryCampbell #281026

JerryCampbell,

Surely you jest? UNETHICAL??? INDEFENSIBLE?

I wouldn’t have let the shorties who were to hoping to cover their “pre sold” shares extend the warrant expiry date! You must be crazy, not only would I defend her, I applaud her and tell her to add more Tabasco to their bleeding wounds!

They have been playing games with our share price all these years and let them extend? I’d give them more of the same but up the kazoo to boot!

She had probably discovered that some of these so called “friendly” parties that bought into the toxic financings were actually “not so friendly” but were busy playing with their “rinse and repeat” scheme, playing with impunity and all the time knowing that they have warrants to cover their shorting activity. Time has finally run out on their games.

Now, with their warrant date (5/2/20) allowed to expire with no new warrants (except for the recent raisings) to back earlier sales.....the tide is out and we will see who has been swimming naked!

The question now, how is LP going to force a “Fail to Deliver” or some other tactic to force delivery of their shorted shares? The shorties are going to call “foul” but who gives a shit! We may get some PR next week or in the coming weeks that would address this and I hope nwbo squeezes them!

NWBO may even do a capital raising but this time, take advantage of their upper hand and get a better deal but only sparingly “dole” out the warrants!

Stay tuned for another exciting episode of “The worm has finally turned”!
Check, your move, shortie!

Poor Man -

05/02/20 10:25 AM

#281072 RE: JerryCampbell #281026

Right, just yet another example of sleazy and entitled behavior by our esteemed CEO. The lawyers really must have struggled with an excuse, since the consideration for the extension was simply restricting the exercise period until Nov. How arbitrary is that - don’t even know how that’s even defined as consideration? Why not just give her $1 million for no reason, and say the consideration is that she can’t spend it until Nov. it’s just crazy.

tryn2

05/03/20 9:05 AM

#281197 RE: JerryCampbell #281026

Well Jerry, the part that worries me is that she agreed to not exercise them until November.... does that mean she doesn’t expect the pps to go up until then...??? Is that because she doesn’t expect topline until then???

blue_skies

05/03/20 12:14 PM

#281247 RE: JerryCampbell #281026

in the how low can she go game, LP knows no limits. This has been repeatedly demonstrated over many years. So it should not surprise anyone.

On the bright side, working backwards, I would suggest a September timeframe for data release.