Replies to post #266525 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[HDGabor]

m-

It sounds like you're saying we need to flip this one so the new score is 3-2 in our favor, even if weighed against each other?

Definitely not.

I said - in my previous post - the as existing SC could be a proof against obviousness, but a lack of SC could not be a proof of obviousness (could not be a negative).

I say: we have 3 SC instead of 2.

More tomorrow.

Best,
G

[HDGabor]

m-

A new day ... a lot of new posts (views), so I will not reply - directly - to this post (top of my previous reply).

Best,
G

ps.: If you think see my upcoming posts