InvestorsHub Logo

BBANBOB

12/20/19 9:43 AM

#602822 RE: mordicai #602820

Mordi

Holders of Class 19 preferreds WERE part of the original 75/25 distribution BASED on THEIR HOLDINGs at the time.

They would not have received any shares OR MARKERS in their acct had they NOT RELEASED correct.

Wouldn't this be sufficient as PROOF one released???????? TIA

hotmeat

12/20/19 9:44 AM

#602823 RE: mordicai #602820

That may be so but the same info can be gleaned from the Escrow Cusips in our Brokerage accounts.

If the LT chooses to request that these Cusips be maintained they will IMO.

I've had 50K Cusips from a long defunct company in my account for over a decade with no issue.

Don't see why any Brokerage would not be able to do the same for WMI's.

The truly sad fact is that it's become clear that many who have been pretending to know...were misleading many.

stoxjock

12/20/19 9:51 AM

#602826 RE: mordicai #602820

Please re-listen to yesterday's hearing, maybe you missed the whole discussion about 'Docketing' the Information of 'Individual' Release-holders for CLASS 19...

BR/WMILT kept on saying they don't/won't generate that information to be 'Docketed' for Court Record despite AG's Valiant efforts and requests to the Court to compel them to do that.. AND, unfortunately the Judge sided with WMILT/BR and Flatly denied to have WMILT provide that information to be 'Docketed' in the Court Record!. I was so PO'ed at the Judge's 'Acquiescence' to every 'mis-representation' that MILT & BR were making as to why they could 'Docket' the Individual Release Holders' Information of CLASS 19 holders!

Split T

12/21/19 8:29 AM

#603122 RE: mordicai #602820

MORDICAI, I believe in due time it will be produced, Just saying. wink, wink!


"On the initial emergence the escrows equaled a multiple of your common or preferred. Wmih had to have a record. One was produced for commons. One can be produced for preferred."