InvestorsHub Logo

Gamesc

12/14/19 9:10 AM

#185233 RE: Dell_Griffith #185232

Totally sealed? Now why would they do that?

DMN

12/14/19 9:11 AM

#185234 RE: Dell_Griffith #185232

Big company involved? Yes, you are right - a lot of secrecy for such a legal affair. This is another confirmation to me that big things are happening.

One can write paragraphs how nothing much has been done and all the money spent, but the fact is that we just don’t know anything because the company is not communicating. NDA’s or a lazy multi-millionaire manufacturing entrepreneur that doesn’t want to make any money with his huge stake in LiquidMetal. You be the judge.

Watts Watt

12/14/19 9:19 AM

#185236 RE: Dell_Griffith #185232

Excellent update. Apreciate your legal insights.

PayMEmf

12/14/19 11:34 AM

#185243 RE: Dell_Griffith #185232

First I want to thank you for your hard work, I know what it takes to shuffle through those transcripts and sharing the information, shows your generosity.

For all this to be blocked to the public eye is very telling that there is something big going on, with Apple attached it doesn’t surprise me one bit.

poop deck pappy

12/14/19 12:29 PM

#185246 RE: Dell_Griffith #185232

Back in the day, Salas and someone else were the caretakers of all things CIP.

Someone may remember.

This was 7 years ago.

jaybiscuit

12/15/19 1:28 AM

#185253 RE: Dell_Griffith #185232

Do any of the Liquidmetal lawyers have a history representing Apple? Just curious...

GracieAnn

12/15/19 9:05 AM

#185256 RE: Dell_Griffith #185232

There are functionally 3 documents filed with the court dated 12/13. One is the settlement agreement and, yes, is substantively redacted, but fully signed. Attached to the settlement agreement is the court’s order signed by all principals and a dismissal of the case, also signed by all principals. The agreed upon court order and case dismissal both contain the admission of liability of john Kang and an injunction against him for future infringement of the Liquidmetal ownership of the Mark Liquidmetal in all instances (including an injunction against Kang asserting any association with BMGs or having a position with LMT or Apple), except the limited exception of coatings. This is a perfect win for Liquidmetal, a perfect loss for Kang and a final disposition of the case (with court reservation of jurisdiction for enforcement).