InvestorsHub Logo

Stock_Barber

12/05/19 12:54 PM

#163251 RE: 1manband #163249

Thanks. I copied and pasted your expert opinions on the DBMM board.

tdbowieknife

12/05/19 1:35 PM

#163254 RE: 1manband #163249

Triple sanctions plus costs...

Stock_Barber

12/05/19 2:04 PM

#163257 RE: 1manband #163249

Oh, but the rebuttal is classic:

In order to revoke any and all actions , for delinquent filings , it would require Congressional Approval because that would be pre-determined and lack due process.


LOVE*PINK

12/05/19 2:57 PM

#163260 RE: 1manband #163249

Most companies don’t file for 5 years and don’t get any OIP. DBMM got OIP because of Asher and there were circumstance as to why DBMM were not able to file for less than 2 years of reports. Read those circumstances.


And who said company can’t WIN Section(12) j case ? Show me a SEC link to that saying no company can win if they don’t file for sometime.

There are rules AL Judges follow. Judge Carol followed the law. OIP was sent on DBMM as it did not file. Later DBMM filed all reports and got audited, so investors knows the fins and are protected so OIP dismissed.

Need SEC links where SEC itself filed the motion to dismiss just because the company filed all its reports ?

Dude, I have done all the DD last 3 years and know it all.

DBMM will throw another egg on Samantha face very soon.

Mark this post.

Zorax

12/05/19 8:01 PM

#163288 RE: 1manband #163249

I'm starting to believe the OTCM itself needs to be investigated for fraud. OTCM is complacent with allowing tickers to be put on pink no information and then they can be traded. The expert market is a scam that the OTCM has perpetuated on the stock markets. I believe OTCM knows full well about these stocks and allow it to go on until some regulatory government agency comes knocking and forces them to do something about it.
There is something definitely wrong with the OTCM situations.

janice shell

12/05/19 11:50 PM

#163303 RE: 1manband #163249

Couldn't agree with you more.