InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

SamuraiProgrammer

11/25/19 10:37 AM

#598106 RE: hotmeat #598104

F&R has to include equity receiving BK remote assets as well. How much that is, no one is certain of.

How can it be fair and reasonable for some other party to receive what belongs to the company. That is the whole point of BK remote assets.
icon url

goodietime

11/25/19 10:39 AM

#598108 RE: hotmeat #598104

How about, F&R =

1)JPM pay Book Value for what it wanted.

2)The RETURN of everything JPM did not want/pay for.

3)ALL VALUE of the Holding Company be RETURNED.

How is any less, considered F&R?

WHO would this value be 'given to'?
icon url

Roach58

11/25/19 10:43 AM

#598112 RE: hotmeat #598104

one problem is that wmih was awarded to us with zero guidance and no business plan. when there was a business plan, it almost immediately did a reverse split(unfair and unreasonable), which in turn resulted in a 12 times reduction in forward looking upside potential. I doubt you'll find ANYONE on this site who sees we are being treated fair and reasonable, or, for that matter ever have so far in this mess.