InvestorsHub Logo

sumdaysoon

11/07/19 5:02 PM

#313325 RE: NOBO #313324

Not anticipating...

“Contemplating...”

To each his own, but I feel like this choice of words has deeper meaning...

TBD...

I-Glow

11/07/19 5:57 PM

#313328 RE: NOBO #313324

Hmmm, Revenue = $0

"The Company’s Board of Directors on October 25, 2019, approved a plan to put forth to the
shareholders that will amend the authorized capital of the Company."

Here is the information about the convertible notes - although Sharp stated they weren't toxic that wasn't true:

"August through September 2019 $300,000 Notes convertible into common stock at $0.0004 per share, 15% interest, due one year from issuance (August through September 2020) with issuance of 375,000,000 warrants with a term of three-years and an exercise price
of $0.0008 per share."

"Interest expense for the nine-months ended September 30, 2019 and accrued at September 30, 2019 on the convertible notes payable
amounted to $3,422. Amortization of the debt discount for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was $9,152."

So Sharp hasn't accomplished anything in the year has been the CEO of GRDO.

IG

I-Glow

11/07/19 6:07 PM

#313329 RE: NOBO #313324

When you are a stinky pinky and not filing with the SEC Sharp can put anything that is best for pumping in the financials.

Now he is contemplating a reverse split. LMAO!

Did Sharp forget about the following:

"Without an r/s, $GRDO would not have been able to do anything. Projects take money & in this day and age, nobody is going to give money to a company with 2.1 billion shares outstanding and no assets unless its toxic debt."

I guess Sharp didn't know about the O/S when he took over as CEO - when he stated that there wouldn't be a reverse split as long as he was the CEO.

Sharp has a problem being truthful.

IG

NoMoDo

11/07/19 9:34 PM

#313333 RE: NOBO #313324

I caught that also. If he ends up finding the holders of the dead shares, GRDO would likely not need to RS at all.

If I were on the BOD and they returned every dead share to the treasury, I would strongly suggest at least a 1 for 2 or even 1 for 4 RS anyway. It wouldn't kill current investors, but it would strengthen the share structure tremendously.

PIGEON RIVER PROSPECTIN,TN

11/08/19 12:17 PM

#313340 RE: NOBO #313324

I like that part :-)

List any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, merger, acquisition, spin-off, or reorganization either currently
anticipated or that occurred within the past 12 months:

Contemplating a reverse stock split of 1-for-8