InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Random_K9

12/01/06 1:34 AM

#82559 RE: Art2004 #82556

Art2004-

Precisely the apparent contradiction that most caught my eye as well.

Perhaps just extremely bad writing? Certainly raises skepticism, no matter the reason.
icon url

Spec29

12/01/06 3:18 AM

#82561 RE: Art2004 #82556

I don't know how many investors realize it...

but that suit is a good thing for all non-Offor investors. Especially if he was thinking of trying to gain control of 70% of the stock!

I don't know how that 70% was going to be obtained because there is not enough unissued shares for Offor to reach that percentage. The total authorized shares for ERHC is 900 million shares if I remember correctly.

With Offor currently owning ~310 million shares, the additional 185 million shares yet to be issued would only (LOL) give Offor ~57% of authorized, issued and outstanding shares.

I really don't care if Offor buys the 185 million unissued shares. I won't be buying 'em anytime soon. I expect him to pay the market price, also. If he wants to trade assets, stock for Starcrest, Starcrest should be valued just as ERHC is valued now. Based on the difference in participation interests between Starcrest and ERHC, Starcrest ain't worth that much currently.

All current shareholders would have the pre-emptive rights on any new shares authorized.

He can't get there with a stock split, either!
icon url

mrogop

12/01/06 8:13 AM

#82576 RE: Art2004 #82556

art:


exactly!!! once again this board is creating an space shuttle from a junkyard...
icon url

walldog0

12/01/06 8:16 AM

#82580 RE: Art2004 #82556

Art2004...you hit the nail on the head....em

icon url

mz157

12/01/06 9:15 AM

#82596 RE: Art2004 #82556

i think your misunderstanding this.

it seems that ERHE (represented by offor), in order to get starcrest, wants to issue shares to purchase starcrest (represented by offor and a few other partners). just because SEO owns both doesnt mean that ERHE owns it?! so im not quite getting your arguement. Its very circular but basically offor would be buying it partly from himself. also realize hes not 100% owner of Starcrest. therefore, he'd issue shares to the other owners of starcrest as well. it sure as hell better not happen. basically, erhe and starcrest are the same. why did starcrest get OPL 291 and now we have to dilute ERHE to death to get it???! a lawsuit would be welcomed