Replies to post #42736 on Cytogenix (fka CYGX)

[spiffy33]

I do agree with you ... change is good ... my only comment is that "younger, more energetic, maintain a stacked Roladex and have some sizzle," IMO even though younger maybe good, is not the way to go unless other criteria is also present. "The Street listens to Warren Buffett and his type and he's not in the above category. I think with age comes some wisdom that a younger one doesn't necessarily have yet. Yes, we need them yesterday!

Good Luck to us all!

Ellen

[david02835]

Marcusaurelius, you're right change is good, but merely changing personnel and keeping the company going with the same poor business plan is not the answer, regardless of the energy created with new, smart people. The company needs to assure itself of the necessary financing to get through the approval process and to market. I have no idea how long that time period will be as the company gives only vague projections. I feel strongly, however, that it is better for the company to take on a strong JV partner rather than to continue to struggle to make ends meet each year. As a stockholder, I would welcome a 50% dilution of my stock value to be assured of the company having time to get things done in the best way. If synDNA is for real, we will all prosper well in the end, but we must get to the end. Appreciate your posts Marcus. Take care.

[nearlynapping]

So if you believe that the former executives were entirely insufficicient, then I assume you are critical, or at least are somewhat disgusted as a shareholder, at the millions of shares that have been given to those individuals for a job that is half done? What will it cost to get the "sizzle" that the "Street" will listen too.

What does MS think about LW and FV trying to get rid of him after all that they were paid??