InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

boozeman

08/31/19 11:42 PM

#212107 RE: concapk #212106

You’re talking about Amarin, not sure they have been prepared for anything thus far. They seem content to be slapped around like a punching bag. Shareholders are a nuisance to this management group. Terrified about the coming weeks and months but in too deep to quit. Woof!
icon url

amarinbullfromchicago

08/31/19 11:50 PM

#212108 RE: concapk #212106

In your opinion what does this mean for amarin? Teva and co start generics ASAP and take a lot of our potential market share? Or we keep fighting this and it goes on a bit longer with a chance of amarin still winning?
icon url

Cupo

09/01/19 4:14 AM

#212110 RE: concapk #212106

I honestly didn’t think the patent think was much of an issue, especially after Teva settled! Based on recent events, could it be THE issue??
Could it be the reason for the cash raise to tie up suppliers?
JT has mentioned on several occasions that he believes their patents are strong!
Always something with AMRN!!
And on the heels of Europe and looks like EVAPORATE will be positive!
icon url

Pharmacydude

09/01/19 5:36 AM

#212111 RE: concapk #212106

Concapk:
Appreciate your knowledge and input!
With the new CVD indication I am confident we get in December the FDA will grant 3 additional years of exclusivity regardless of generic case outcome so we still have some breathing room. By the time that ends we will have revenue from Europe, Canada, China etc. Amarin will take a heavy hit if it loses 7 years of US revenue (the 7 highest years) but it will survive. I disagree with those that think Amarin can complete with generics by tying up suppliers or cutting margin, I think US revenue drops to negligible right away.
My question to you is: why is this all hinged to 1 patent when Amarin has over 50? What about R-it patents with specific patents for treating CVD? As a pharmacist I have never seen a Brand sold for 1 indication (V for CVD) and a generic (for Marine) for another. Impossible to monitor.

My thoughts:
I don’t believe the rising short interest is due to the expectation the FDA is going to screw Amarin at the Adcom. Hedging maybe but not record high short interest when the science is rock solid.
Weak patents explain why the STRENGTH trial was continued, why short interest has skyrocketed, the recent surge in puts and the reason there hasn’t been a buyout. The only things I can’t explain is why the Baker Brothers haven’t sold (they must have thoroughly researched the patents) and why GS and MS would be involved in a 25 million share deal at $18.

Amarin has always had the best lawyers money can buy and have had a very good legal track record so I’m confident they saw this coming but I have to admit my confidence in the stock has been significantly shaken by this turn of events.

I would be very interested in hearing HDG’s thoughts on the situation as he has stated a strong confidence in the patents in the past.

TIA