InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Yoyippie

08/08/19 9:24 PM

#206971 RE: L0tsaluck2000 #206970

Are you high?

"If the goal was to bring the BO price expection down, its working. Virtually everyone on this board would gladly sell at half what their expectations were a month ago.

If AMRN was worth 100 bil yesterday it's still worth a 100 bill today
icon url

sts66

08/09/19 2:24 PM

#207367 RE: L0tsaluck2000 #206970

The stunningly suspicious irregular treatment of AMRN builds such a compelling trail of evidence that they will not be able to get away with a CLR.



FDA does not give a damn about any guff they may get for taking any actions - if they believe MO affected statin efficacy, they will issue a CRL - it's a real possibility at this time.

Per the "why did FDA ask AMRN to postpone AC news", I'd ask why the FDA informed them before it was published in the Federal Register? Why wouldn't they publish and inform AMRN at the same time?

BTW, the announcement STILL isn't in the Federal Register - did FDA ask AMRN to violate SEC regs on releasing material info? Is the 3 day rule 3 calendar days or 3 business days?

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/search?conditions%5Bpublication_date%5D%5Bgte%5D=07%2F10%2F2019&conditions%5Bterm%5D=advisory+committee#

icon url

Corgy02

08/09/19 9:34 PM

#207525 RE: L0tsaluck2000 #206970

absolutely a whiff of corruption at the fda---more than a whiff---but I think you are right---we were hoping for a 40-60 B buyout---let someone offer 25B as has been brought up on boards for a while and its gone