InvestorsHub Logo

Grande Drip

07/24/19 4:51 PM

#19659 RE: exisnet #19658

Agreed, should be illegal, though they did say in their last filing in 2017 that they raised the AS because they knew payments of shares were going to be needed to pay debt. And someone updated the OS a couple of times. And, the per the settlement agreement, Livingston could not have more than 10% of the OS at any given time. So, did they stick to that stipulation or completely ignore it? Was this all part of a ruse or was there truly something going on in the background to get QSIM going again?