InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,473.17
(
-0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,288.80
(
-0.62%
)
Dow Jones
39,134.76
(
0.77%
)
Brent Oil
85.00
(
-0.01%
)
Bitcoin
64,612.30
(
-0.32%
)
Post# of 19822
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Grande Drip

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 3
Posts 810
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/10/2009

Grande Drip

Re: exisnet post# 19658

Wednesday, 07/24/2019 4:51:35 PM

Wednesday, July 24, 2019 4:51:35 PM

Post# of 19822
Agreed, should be illegal, though they did say in their last filing in 2017 that they raised the AS because they knew payments of shares were going to be needed to pay debt. And someone updated the OS a couple of times. And, the per the settlement agreement, Livingston could not have more than 10% of the OS at any given time. So, did they stick to that stipulation or completely ignore it? Was this all part of a ruse or was there truly something going on in the background to get QSIM going again?

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up