InvestorsHub Logo

flipper44

07/03/19 1:56 PM

#235347 RE: hmuney #235345

Thanks. I had not noticed that. It was an accurate summary, imho, with the minor exception being that when they compared the info (indeterminate) group with the 331 blended trial data, they forgot to mention they were comparing it with the March 2017 data from the JTM -- not the improved data from SNO.

Lykiri

07/03/19 6:59 PM

#235362 RE: hmuney #235345

Nothing new, but anyone else notice they finally posted the June 4th press release on https://nwbio.com/press-releases/ ? I use a tool to track changes on web pages and got an alert, which is how I noticed.



Hmuney,

Thank you!

I hope you can help me. It's about my message 235063= https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=149671338

This is from te current NHS Health Research Authority website and i am interested in the opinion of the REC (London - Chelsea Research Ethics Committee).
https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/application-summaries/research-summaries/dc-vax-brain-phase-iii-trial-for-gbm-current/

I wonder what this website looked like between April 2015 and August 2015.
Maybe you can use your tool to figure that out. I am particularly interested in the REC opinion of that moment.

IMO the "opinion" (or something like that) was:
Reasons for delay correspond to:Sponsor

I found this message from Monentum2play: 64049 date 06/09/2016 https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=123193575 and i think he/she was looking at the same website.

It looks like the UCLH paper states that the reasons for the "delay"(?) correspond to the "sponsor".

Thank you!

NOTE: I want to highlight this quote of Sentiment from the same day:

So if Germany put the brakes on, and Les mentions to diver that they don't want to have any other patients being treated unfairly (something like that)... that might add up to the company then deciding make the halt trial wide.


IMO driver = iwasadiver
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=123201095

flipper44

07/03/19 10:46 PM

#235369 RE: hmuney #235345

In my biased state, I personally believe the press release written for June 4, 2019 (but released and placed on the website today) was held in abeyance until the SAP was filed -- again, I think the SAP draft was filed with regulators on or before today.