Replies to post #575024 on Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[stoxjock]

" that he was sorry and it was his mistake and his fault!!!!!!! Fault for what? if nothing was done wrong???????? "

Exactly.. A Fault that instead of paying them $72MM will pay them maybe more than $!BB.. A Fault?? Really?? To Brazenly STEAL from Equityholders recoveries under the cover of "Fault"... Is it a "Fault" or "Brazen Theft"...This is the Brazen "Standard Modus Operandi" that the Big Investment Banks (AKA the "Under-Writers) use to defend themselves in the Courts from us Commoners Every Time they are caught 'Red-handed' Stealing...

[ron_66271]

Wrong Again BB0b.

I have posted the language of the 510(b) Stipulation from Plan 6 many times. Modifications to the Class 19 Stipulation for Plan 7 did NOT require Court approval. The 510(b) Stipulation was Court approved.

Alice is TOTALLLY WRONG regarding the UW Stipulations. The UW own about 1% of the Preferred class, P's and K's. Own, NOT gifted.

Plan 6 510(b) Stipulation;
Class 19; TPS REITs.
Class 20; Preferred Series , P's and K's.


Plan 7 Class 19 Stipulation;
Class 19 and 20 became Pari passu. Therefore class 20 was moved into class 19, and class 20 became empty.

This is why the UW claim was moved from class 20 to class 19.

[Johnnyiwantsome]

BBANBOB,
I was not there, nor can I lend a lot to the argument of the case. My response was to Mordi saying AZ was wrong. The district court of appeals does not have to here the case. The only way to be heard if the appellate court finds the lower court erred. Other than that they will not consider new info or anything else the will only hear the case if they find Judge W erred in the case. I am just very suspect of the timing. Her past even with the old HOT COFFEE burn trick really does not sit that well with me either...kind of seems Trip and Fall which is a bit low for me.
And yes pard we can always disagree as the river runs to deep to let pebbles disrupt the fine waters we share.

Regards,
B