InvestorsHub Logo

AZCowboy

04/17/19 8:56 PM

#570808 RE: LuckyPanda #570804

~ LP’, Respectfully’, “Simply Thinking ?” At This Level Isn’t Anywhere Near Enough’ ~

The objective is to “Win”, ... period ... and in order to “Win” ? ... You Have To Be 200% Sure’ ... and have Actual Proof Of Wrongdoing That Needs To Be Presented ... the Court As well as your adversary, can not be allowed any wiggle room whatsoever ...

AZ

goodietime

04/17/19 8:58 PM

#570811 RE: LuckyPanda #570804

I don't take Exhibit B as any type of accusation.

I believe she is laying out a case of 'how it could happen', and asking the Court to make SURE, it DOESN'T happen. imo

lodas

04/17/19 9:04 PM

#570815 RE: LuckyPanda #570804

Lucky.... a lawyer knows better than to make an implication of a fraudulent action if in fact the hedges used that money for years without a disclosure to shareholders...they could get a counter lawsuit against Alice for libel... she is not that stupid to go to court with NOTHING , but innuendo.... she got the "goods believe me, if she worked for JPM.... she knows... Lodas......and she might even have documents to back it up....maybe thats what A/M have been doing all that bookwork for...

dmceng

04/17/19 9:23 PM

#570828 RE: LuckyPanda #570804

LP

Alice is very thorough. She is a pro you know. Not her first rodeo. And she has a top not firm doing her grunt work.