~ LP’, Respectfully’, “Simply Thinking ?” At This Level Isn’t Anywhere Near Enough’ ~
The objective is to “Win”, ... period ... and in order to “Win” ? ... You Have To Be 200% Sure’ ... and have Actual Proof Of Wrongdoing That Needs To Be Presented ... the Court As well as your adversary, can not be allowed any wiggle room whatsoever ...
Lucky.... a lawyer knows better than to make an implication of a fraudulent action if in fact the hedges used that money for years without a disclosure to shareholders...they could get a counter lawsuit against Alice for libel... she is not that stupid to go to court with NOTHING , but innuendo.... she got the "goods believe me, if she worked for JPM.... she knows... Lodas......and she might even have documents to back it up....maybe thats what A/M have been doing all that bookwork for...