InvestorsHub Logo

blueyedcatch

03/17/19 8:45 PM

#95171 RE: DewDiligence #95165

I need proof that that was done the way you say. Ken has a fiduciary duty to shareholders,and giving away over 20 million dollars worth of Adxs shares is criminal,and has no merit either. Why would he do such a thing,unless he`s a complete moron? For a lousy litle selling stipulation? Nonsense. Prove it dew.

ubmmg

03/18/19 9:49 AM

#95196 RE: DewDiligence #95165

Dew,

Your scenario could be plausible, however, it leaves the following out of the consideration: a weak data at the AACR. Then what? If ADXS decides to go ahead with the raise after the weak or not-so-great data is publicized, then the raise would result in a massive collapse of the share price. That would be a proverbial nail in the head. Raise from the position of weakness is a death sentence for us. Don't you agree?

mm2k

03/18/19 3:16 PM

#95215 RE: DewDiligence #95165

Dew, is your interest piqued more by the warrant holders that did not take the conversion to shares, or more by the one(s?) that did?