Replies to post #64476 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[jrt03]

Thanks for going Zomby! Good reporting

[Nicasurf]

Thank you Sir!!!

[justus1]

Thank you for your time!

[tsand]

An agreement is an agreement! If the other side did not know which direction to pursue on the non-infringement, then they should have asked for more time (costs) and not agreed to the "limits". Isn't it a game, anyway, to stir the pot and make both sides "over-prepare"? Hopefully the Judge will say "times up, go to trial and prepare your defense", or we settle out-of-court. JMHO

[ice2014]

Thanks Zomby for your time and efforts.

[Frankp]

Thanks

[Nestegg McMuffin]

Charles Dickens started off as a court reporter. Zomby, you might just have a classic novel in you yet. The Chanbond Papers. A Tale of Three Patents. David Copperland.

Whatever it is, a happy ending is guaranteed.

[easyme]

Thank you sir!

UOIP!

[gooferball]

Thanks Zomby, you did good man! Appreciate the heck outta that great report!

[handMMJ]

Z,thank you for the work you have done! Appreciate!

[psychocharttrader]

Thanks for the work sir!

[thunley1]

Thank you Mr. Z. You are a good man to make that trip. Hope you got your Italian food for lunch. We sure appreciate your efforts.

[Katoprimate]

Do we have a time of when the response is due?

[TonyJoe1957]

Once, again, Zombie, we all owe you.
All of you guys are great in keeping us up-to-date.
A really excellent team!
AJ

[Gm1850]

You rock Zomby thanks for breaking it down in layman’s terms

[Gonfishun]

Thanks for taking the time to go and share this info.

[Ranger185]

Great work Z, very much appreciated. Hopefully the judge puts an end to their nonsense.

[AllinFun]

I think the Chanbond counsel is very stubborn in not allowing A new theory to be presented to the court. Judging off their response to the expert discovery they were very aggressive in getting the Judge to deny their new theory which was presented in expert discovery when they had months and months to bring this theory up in fact discovery. You dont get to the end of expert discovery and then just bring up a new angle that the opposition hasn't had a chance to articulate their own argument around that theory. They are out of line and deserve to be punished for doing so because they are disrespecting the courts procedures. I think as you said the Judge will be siding with us because its also just another ploy to delay so they have to go back to facr discovery and spend more time articulating arguments. Also the Judge will see how disrespectful they are and get rid of the nonsense.

Appreciate you Z. Always nice knowing we got a weapon in the vicinity of the court proceedings when we need him.

[Gmc2020]

Thanks zomby.

The below pacer describes the the dispute being discussed in the transcript that zomby viewed.

It is a letter from chanbond that lays out the agreement made to reduce the number of claims and the combinations of such claim construction of prior art to 4.

It clearly show how this agreement was violated

https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A1438dc8f-852f-476d-995f-159373d7227a

[Scruffer]

Outstanding. How was the S&M at Mrs Robino's?

"Spaghetti and Meatballs" people. :-)

As always, thank you zombywolf.

A debt of more than gratitude is due both to you and King Henry CDLVIII.

If we win, a little something extra is going to be provided.

Personally, for the investors, Vegas sounds most appealing.

Secondly, a cruise for the family and all.

We can get a banquet room, have dinner and distribute prizes.

We have to win and have funds settled first,

Scruffer

[magnus_invest]

You did all of us a solid and I thank you very much for that.

Keep calm and stay long UOIP,
~Magnus