Umibe5690,
Most of what I recall comes from Dr. Linda Liau's post mortum tumor sample analysis of earlier phase clinical trials and other research papers. Methylation has been noted to occur in mesenchymal but much more rarely. Early on, GBM research of biopsied or resected tumor tissue helped identify the prevalence of tumor genotypes and phenotypes. Once Dr. Liau realized how important utilizing all of the resected tissue was she stopped pushing for tissue for ID purposes so that important tumor antigens might not be missed in lysate preparation. I remember spending quite a bit of time early on to distinguish potential benefit based on groups like methylated MGMT and mesenchymal subgroup. Hyper methylated patients is also another small separate group that does well even with just SOC. I think these best performers are also highly likely to be pseudoprogressors, which are expected to do well with treatment and we're put in a separate group. So perhaps they were minimized by inclusion criteria so much in this trial, which seeks to mainly determine the impact of treatment on the middle group of patients, that they were not pointed out. The add in of pseudos at the end of the trial for analysis to get a look at the big picture is important because this group and unmethylated seem to be 2 reasons for mentioning home runs. Methylated MGMT patients are doing better too but appear to have a lesser percentage of improvement noted compared to historical than seen in unmethylated so far. Best wishes.