Replies to post #61547 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[jrt03]

Thanks as always! :-)

[sqrl]

I've always been amazed how the PTO examiners cite "obviousness" to invalidate as to combinations of inventions and how one "skilled in the art" would have known to come up with invention at that time. WHY DIDN"T THEY????????
Chanbond did, hence the patent.

Anyone know the timeframe for Chanbond to reply?????

[ytse]

khenry,
Thank you very much for your PACER update.
I am always looking forward to read it.
Long UOIP.

[Nicasurf]

Thank you!!! Who can tell me what this means for us?
I read some of it but do not understand all this legal stuff.