InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

exisnet

01/12/19 5:57 PM

#49173 RE: beachsideeddy2 #49172

Since TA says no dilution must revert to ceo trash talk...
icon url

Ikin_Lockpick

01/12/19 8:07 PM

#49175 RE: beachsideeddy2 #49172

Big claim you have there. Now what's the dates of incarnation, list of charges and which prison was he in?
icon url

WALL STREET KID

01/12/19 9:00 PM

#49180 RE: beachsideeddy2 #49172

It was EXPUNGED end of story!!!

Did he serve time & if so where and for how long???

Ever thought it was a plea bargained which it wasn't according to Tony anish Via Stervc in [url][/url][tag]POST#31440[/tag] that resulted in the expunged verdict???


Plea bargaining in the United States. Plea bargaining in the United States is very common; the vast majority of criminal cases in the United States are settled by plea bargain rather than by a jury trial. They have also been increasing in frequency—they rose from 84% of federal cases in 1984 to 94% by 2001.

icon url

WALL STREET KID

01/12/19 9:10 PM

#49184 RE: beachsideeddy2 #49172

Confirmation of the Expungement With that Old Info...

I actually asked Tony Anish, the MLHC CEO, about this when I spoke to him. There was not enough evidence to prove him guilty as he was not guilty, but the judge told him that if he agreed to go on probation and remain clean for three years, he would drop all charges to Expunge the case to be as if nothing ever happened. As indicated below, Tony complied and the case was Expunged.

For future reference for investors, with understanding the actual rule for stocks, per SEC rules, anything of a legal issue to where an Officer of a company is criminally charged, he can't be an Officer of a public company for until 5 years after such date of officially being charged has elapsed. Just for the record, this was something that transpired greater than 5 years ago so it's a non-issue regardless.

Again, he was Expunged as indicated within the Pacer database as public info for all to review. Here is confirmation of the MLHC CEO's Expungement to where the case was dismissed below:


v/r
Sterling