InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Umibe5690

06/21/18 9:09 PM

#179088 RE: flipper44 #179087

Could not agree more.
icon url

scotty3371

06/21/18 9:10 PM

#179089 RE: flipper44 #179087

Waiting to give linda more stock for pennies?
icon url

HappyLibrarian

06/21/18 9:12 PM

#179090 RE: flipper44 #179087

Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory?
icon url

scotty3371

06/21/18 9:29 PM

#179092 RE: flipper44 #179087

Flipper, what does Ashkan know??
icon url

Doc logic

06/21/18 10:19 PM

#179100 RE: flipper44 #179087

flipper44,

I agree with you and others in principle. The only exception I see to this is to keep the blind on any potential improved manufacturing version being tested as equivalent by site(s) and not by year.

You said you seem to think that the last 31 have a higher concentration of methylated MGMT promoter. Can you show me again where you saw that as I missed it the first go round. By the way, IF this group was selected for methylation might it not be to improve statistical analysis of the methylated group and thus important to keep blinded? I know your other points and evidence about this group as you made that clear. Best wishes.