Replies to post #136952 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[janice shell]

Not knowing or understanding toxic financing doesn't invalidate that NSS exists.

In a way, it does. For the past 15 years, untold numbers of people losing money in penny stocks have been mistaking toxic dilution for NSS. The most extreme case was CMKX. The reality was that management had issued nearly 800 BILLION shares. But there're still people who believe in an elaborate conspiracy involving NSS.

As for delivery and the loophole that Dilorio was proposing.... There seems to be a healthy amount of people that think it did and still does existt.

And there are still Xers who believe they're going to be "paid" very large sums. For what, I have no idea.

And you should read 1manband's post about the role of the transfer agent, too...

[sidedraft]

Does your statement mean that the dumping of bushel baskets of shares by toxic financing has to be NSS? That would be the Red Herring Deluxe.

Not knowing or understanding toxic financing doesn't invalidate that NSS exists.