InvestorsHub Logo

mickeybritt

05/12/18 9:09 AM

#422553 RE: ciciagt #422552

ciciagt


In due time the patent act will be struck down as unconstitutional. It is
good to see finally companies are beginning to defend their patents based
on the constitution and not a patent act that invalidates patents. I have
said all along how can a office grant you something then use all their
resources to take it away and say oops my bad see you later by the way
if you want another patent come see us. The owner of the worthless piece
of paper can be out millions defending what they was supposed to have
the full protection of the constitution and it be revoked and not a damn
penny for the issuing office incompetence.

I know the only person in this country who is hated more than me is our
President. The treatment I been afforded is a disgrace and you can
put it in your pipe and smoke it but the truth is the truth.


JMO
Mickey

la-tsla-fan

05/13/18 11:36 AM

#422559 RE: ciciagt #422552

The arguments presented by Christy, Inc. are so intuitive and so common-sensical that they are bound to be rejected!

A patent holder spends a lot of resources to secure a patent. Then he spends resources to maintain the patent. Then he is forced to defend the patent at the PTAB. Then the PTAB invalidates the patent and thereby admits that the USPTO messed up the first time! And yet, the USPTO and its cash cow, the PTAB, gets to keep ALL the collected monies. There seems to be an obvious incentive for the USPTO to grant patents on all the applications it receives and then collect money again to invalidate them.

WOW! How did our Congress pass the AIA legislation?

We love you AMERICA, but please, please right this tremendous wrong.

jmo
LA