InvestorsHub Logo

zombywolf

03/11/18 12:19 PM

#35966 RE: clokisticking #35922

He knows that, AND he knows Keough cant prove any of the charges he makes. Administrative acceptance of paperwork is, to him, a guarantee of victory at a trial. Similar to his mentor's declaration of a favorable outcome of his case being dismissed. His BS will remain that, as Keough knows he has no case and wont file a new one because of that.

PhenixBleu

03/11/18 1:05 PM

#35969 RE: clokisticking #35922

I can agree that an expert witness could support Keough's claim of patent flooding, along with Otiko's breach of his employment agreement with Keough.

I disagree with your interpretation of the judicial ruling. No analogies needed.

Just because Otiko’s petition to dismiss the claim was denied doesn’t mean Keough has a VIABLE complaint or case ... I can make a claim that my gender is female and have the courts consider that I have a case worth hearing but ultimately when the comparing of presented facts comes forward and it is found that my formula (male gender) differs greatly from that of another (female gender) the court will ultimately decide that I don’t have any grounds for a suit ... as in the case of Keogh trying to sue Otiko ... It will be found that the formulas in question when compared one to another will be like comparing apples and oranges ... IMHO