InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 93
Posts 8868
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/06/2014

Re: clokisticking post# 35922

Sunday, 03/11/2018 1:05:02 PM

Sunday, March 11, 2018 1:05:02 PM

Post# of 73768
I can agree that an expert witness could support Keough's claim of patent flooding, along with Otiko's breach of his employment agreement with Keough.

I disagree with your interpretation of the judicial ruling. No analogies needed.

Just because Otiko’s petition to dismiss the claim was denied doesn’t mean Keough has a VIABLE complaint or case ... I can make a claim that my gender is female and have the courts consider that I have a case worth hearing but ultimately when the comparing of presented facts comes forward and it is found that my formula (male gender) differs greatly from that of another (female gender) the court will ultimately decide that I don’t have any grounds for a suit ... as in the case of Keogh trying to sue Otiko ... It will be found that the formulas in question when compared one to another will be like comparing apples and oranges ... IMHO