InvestorsHub Logo

BBANBOB

02/18/18 12:13 PM

#509792 RE: jerrylev #509790

Since it was shown yesterday here on this board that SHAREs can be used to purchase SUBS and those subs Assets and the contention about the payout matrix has always been SAID by some ONLY TO BE FOR THE DISTRIBUTION of SHARES, then it again APPEARS this can an may very well take place that way and since it is or WAS ONLY for the distribution of shares then the 75/25 prevails YET AGAIN

All need to remember that if what these different subs are holding and THEY WERE NOT DISCLOSED within the BK, then they are not the BK Estates assets and the last heir needs to be dealt with, DAT BE US MARKER HOLDERS.

I hate to get all giddy about this but I AM ALL GIDDY about this thing, far more than I ever have been.............

AZCowboy

02/18/18 12:17 PM

#509794 RE: jerrylev #509790

~ There’s No Confusion Regarding APR ~

Had Judge Walrath Actually ... RULED - that Plan 7’s Approved Reorganization aligned with a ... Global Removal of the Absolute Priority Rule ... ? ... It would have become a legal precedent setting issue, for ALL future reorganization’s, ... IT WASN’T

Plan 7’s Settled Result and Court Approved Reorganization, Was ALLOWED to remove the powerful Absolute Priority Rule For ... FOUR Specific Issues, ... ONLY’, ...

AZ