Well, starting from 2011 (that's the earliest I went back), they seemed to be having problem; lawsuits, having an independent auditor overlooking them, etc. As far as the marks go, if you read through the document, it seemed to me that the later reports were not that serious. They still had marks against them, but so do many of the auditing firms. I would think it would be pretty difficult to abide 100% to every rule in the books. You're bound to make mistakes. As long as they correct them and show they are trying hard to do the right thing, they should be okay. They did write a letter to the SEC expressing that exact sentiment. So maybe their earlier problems are over?