InvestorsHub Logo

shiftyshoes

01/02/18 11:23 AM

#502327 RE: BBANBOB #502322

THEY ONLY ONEs HARMED HERE IN FACT WERE PRE HOLDERS

All of us were harmed by this unsuitable clusterfuck of a settlement, with no accountability anywhere. Pre or Post. Our Reps made promises to all, told us all of the importance of WMILT's, everyone we were going to sue, put Retail in an entirely UNSUITABLE investment and have delivered nothing. ALL ILLEGAL.

None of this should be acceptable. We could sit and watch it play out and hope, or we could challenge it. An escrow Q&A with the players who can give answers should be demanded after all this time.

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/unsuitable.asp#ixzz4udv0ou7k

DEFINITION of 'Unsuitable (Unsuitability)'
A situation where an investment strategy does not meet the objectives and means of an investor. In most parts of the world, financial professionals have a duty to take steps that ensure that an investment is suitable for a client. For example, in the United States these rules are enforced by the NASD.

2221

01/02/18 11:24 AM

#502328 RE: BBANBOB #502322

Yes but there is a catch many of us sold common and bought preferred for better exchanges to wmih shares so that makes real pre holders NOT PRE HOLDERS ANY MORE