InvestorsHub Logo

Bill_ENG

11/15/17 1:09 PM

#25387 RE: spin1 #25384

NO because if I go that far, then I get to count an extra 1 for 200 reverse split from NEAH and we seem to be on the cusp of a 3rd reverse split.

Even so, NEAH was not public at that time.

Its not even comparable.

My point is, moving forward with a business plan and earning revenue even while not running in the black is preferable to never earning revenue and constantly burning and diluting stock value.

Anyone here ever hear of Amazon ?

Difficult to rah rah a company that has destroyed shareholder value in 2 different massive long term dilutions.

I could have been more accurate and in my example had a year 2000 buy on BLDP but I would not have been able to comparably do such a thing with NEAH could I ?

I could have started in 2006 but that would have been wiped out by the 2009 RS on NEAH almost completely. I could also have presented a 2006 buy in both and then a 2009 or even a 2010 buy again but Ballard would have eclipsed NEAH on both.

There is no comparison to share value erosion and for anyone to suggest they are, is enough to show their bias.

JMHO

Bill

Bill_ENG

11/15/17 1:27 PM

#25389 RE: spin1 #25384

Even so the holidays are upon us and as I said before it appears nothing done in 2017 that will assist NEAH's valuation.

It looks like the pumpers will have to start pointing at next spring/summer as the "Time of Ascendance " then when that doesn't happen they will push it out to the fall of 2018 and so on and so forth until 2019 and on and on.

Been through this since 2011 with this co it has not changed and most likely will not change.

There is still no publication on the Vaunted Battery Patent application.

JMHO

Bill