XNRGI Inc fka NPWZ

[Bill_ENG]

NO because if I go that far, then I get to count an extra 1 for 200 reverse split from NEAH and we seem to be on the cusp of a 3rd reverse split.

Even so, NEAH was not public at that time.

Its not even comparable.

My point is, moving forward with a business plan and earning revenue even while not running in the black is preferable to never earning revenue and constantly burning and diluting stock value.

Anyone here ever hear of Amazon ?

Difficult to rah rah a company that has destroyed shareholder value in 2 different massive long term dilutions.

I could have been more accurate and in my example had a year 2000 buy on BLDP but I would not have been able to comparably do such a thing with NEAH could I ?

I could have started in 2006 but that would have been wiped out by the 2009 RS on NEAH almost completely. I could also have presented a 2006 buy in both and then a 2009 or even a 2010 buy again but Ballard would have eclipsed NEAH on both.

There is no comparison to share value erosion and for anyone to suggest they are, is enough to show their bias.

JMHO

Bill