InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

rawman

11/11/17 11:29 AM

#42469 RE: Johnny_C #42468

HOW QUICKLY WE FORGET! The paid consultant previously made the same ridiculous claim and was quickly proven wrong!

Attorney silverberg was not granted a partial contingency agreement, that is a moronic and untrue claim.


The actual verbiage describing the "Partial Contingency Agreement" was posted on this Board!

TAUG'S LEAST CREDIBLE SOURCE OF INFO, THE PAID CONSULTANT JOHNNY C, STRIKES AGAIN!

BTW...it is interesting how the paid consultant was a huge Silverberg supporter, despite all the screw-ups that were cited on this Board! The screw-ups were many, including the Florida venue, the late jury demand filing, etc., but now Silverberg is a pariah in the eyes of TAUG's paid consultant! Is it possible Paul Silverberg might want to review a copy of the post? Regardless, TAUG is still on the hook to pay Silverberg for his legal representation!
icon url

diannedawn

11/11/17 12:32 PM

#42474 RE: Johnny_C #42468

If it is "moronic and untrue" then perhaps you should ask BSeth WHY he included this in a PR...
"In addition, the Pre-Trial Conference has been scheduled for November 2, 2017. The Company is highly confident in the legal merits of its case as well as the evidentiary record. In light of today's event(s), the Company can now disclose that it is finalizing negotiations for a partial Contingency Engagement Agreement with its litigation counsel -- Silverberg & Weiss, PA"

Did he PR this with weaselly "finalizing", NOT FINALIZED, wording,
just in an attempt to silence the critics who said if the case was such a SLAM DUNK as claimed,
then WHY weren't the attorney's willing to work on a contingency???
LOOKS THAT WAY TO ME!!!

Thanks for letting us know the BSeth was spreading BS as usual!!!
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tauriga-sciences-inc-assigned-trial-111500851.html

ROTFLMAO