InvestorsHub Logo

Johnny_C

11/11/17 11:15 AM

#42468 RE: rawman #42463

Well, let’s see what is on the balance sheet in Next quarter regarding legal fees because I? think your comments are full of skat.

Attorney silverberg was not granted a partial contingency agreement, that is a moronic and untrue claim. In fact, he hurt this case by never drafting a proper complaint with exhibits like emails and depositions. Not to mention filing the case in the wrong jurisdiction and never answering the 2 prong test that could have kept the case in Florida. The fact that the court kept ruling in favor of TAUG despite what I? consider to have been half ass representation is a testament to how strong TAUG’s case was. I? can state with certainty that pre Nixon Peabody Sulvrrberg wanted that and the BOD even was against it.

The speculation that the case was continued because of settlement talks is nonsense to. Both parties were surprised. Moreover in constant conversations with Seth he was very strong about not settling for less than about 3.5 mil. Even according to Bozo Berman friend Taug was offered close to 2 mil in prior settlement talks. Seth did not initiate any settlement talks.

Lastly, consider this phrase, there are 2 ways to skin a cat. There are also multiple ways to get to a dollar. 20 nickels, ten dimes and 4 quarters are just a few ways.

The judgement will be final and there is a portion that is confidential. Settlements usually require compromise on both sides.

As far as the trial date being changed, we booked hotel rooms right at that time. So that was a surprise. The judges were excellent in this case but they also know how to maneuver parties into being more amenable to settlements. As most of the court phone conferences and letters were not open to the public we will never know.

Game Set Match Taug

Now let’s just see what next year brings. I? think the bottom is in