InvestorsHub Logo

geocappy1

10/20/17 5:40 PM

#314848 RE: biopharm #314843

All good Bio but this BOD has been quiet and we assumed they had our interest at heart because they didn't want the competition to know. Now we find that they are going to turn the company into a CDMO and they are being challenged by outsiders. The court has basically said they are thieves.

Where is their explanation for the court saying they are thieves? Where is the results from all the collaborations. They are about to be thrown out yet they offer no explanation for their lack of information. They offer no rebuttal to the Ronin accusations. Could it be they have no answer and they are trying to grab the last bit as they go out the door?

Ronin may owe us a little more but the current BOD owes a whole lot more. Your skepticism is way out of balance.

TampaTradr

10/20/17 8:03 PM

#314859 RE: biopharm #314843

“So why is it that it is wrong of me to request RCM to speak out of this .....”

It is not any more wrong than for me to request $45 a share.

It is just that it is pie in the sky thinking and not reality.

bidrite

10/21/17 9:14 AM

#314895 RE: biopharm #314843

and obviously clear is my longtime stance of pointing out the dozens of "undisclosed pipelines



So why is it that it is wrong of me to request RCM to speak out of this



Thanks for proving my point Biopharm. You have a longtime stance of making up "undisclosed" (meaning you don't know if they are real) pipelines and it's completely ok for your BOD to leave them undisclosed. However, you're demanding that somehow Ronin, who is an investor, to communicate to you what exactly are these pipelines. I'm pretty sure Ronin isn't reading IHUB and thinking "ohhh we need to validate the two million puzzle pieces that Biopharm has connected PPHM to every single BP, Government Agency, and philanthropist to.