wwhatthe, what is your guess on what figure could, conceivably, remain for escrows? "It’s all of this cash, (about $306 Billion Dollars) that is used to pay off any debt or contractual obligations… including the Preferred Shareholders.
And any money left over… it’s distributed among the common equity holders…"
So… It’s the common equity holders… who have the contractual obligation to the other investors… including the preferred shareholders… As the owners of the company… it’s the common equity holder’s Assets that have to be liquidated and turned into cash… this cash and all of the other cash from WaMu’s bank accounts, plus the tax returns. And the cash generated from its subsidiary WMMRC in runoff mode … (now WMIH’s subsidiary)… plus the liquidation of WMI/WMIIC.
Thanks for your good DD.I agree with you and would give you 100% right to break the 75/25 conversion rate as you wish but there you forget only one little Thing called Propectus and duties of the OLD WAMU versus the New WMIH.This prospectus made from the first time the Prefereds were issued which you with or without knowlledge forget to mention have to do with the Prefereds Right to be switched into the Comon shares of the Company in case their misse for four consecutive Quarters their dividents.And when this happens and COmpany for one or other reason let it happens they can chouse to either be switched and changed into Commons.And ocasionally strange enough the convertion rate is almoust the same have been aplied to the Post BK treatment of the already known and famouse 75/25 you so likely would like to see gone and forgoten.So in the light of this small detaille I request that you re doe your post and make more DD in conection with this small Item which made the Settlement been formulated to this point in this way.Thanks for the rest but I still think 100% you are wrong and the 75%/25% is the law of any future distribution to come to EQUITY akka Prefereds+Commons.
Pard I am on my third or fourth read trying to digest!
Thanks very much for this info.......... And BOVIOUSLY as well for the time it took too compile all of this info in a simple way to see...........!!!!!!!!!!
wwhatthe, great writeup and thanks. Just one question:
In your example below, you state, "WaMu creates a mortgage." However, you never stated where and when WaMu pays off the home builder. WaMu must pay the builder that money.
Just wondering out loud....... again, thanks for all your work...
For example… all IMHO… Lets look at it as one investment… WaMu creates a mortgage for the homeowner… the homeowner pays WaMu a monthly payment … the principle amount of the payment goes to pay down the principle amount of the mortgage… and the interest part of the payment, is WaMu’s profit… WaMu receives the entire monthly payment… So WaMu owns the entire investment…
whatthe, the solution lies within the "Inception Balance Sheet" and the $40.2B "asset - related equity adjustmens" (the line below the yellow marked line) IMO!
Do you know this document?
These $40.2 B in "asset - related equity adjustmens" is exactly the sum of the "Subtotal - Other Claims" ($13.7B) (IMO the WMB Bonds which JPM did not acquire) and the total equity "Net Assets At Inception" ($26.4B), which JPM either did not get at the time of the inception or had to pay for it later IMO
Or is there another reason why the FDIC subtracts the $26B in equity in addition to the 13.7B Liabilities?!?
Note: These $40.2B is also roughly the difference from your $258.5B to the $299B from your post
$299B - $258.5B = $40.5
BTW, thank you for your post although I DO NOT believe your calculations and assumptions about the mortgages and $299B coming back to the estate are true. I am in the camp of $10B to $30B...
FDIC internal inception balance sheet, as of 09/25/2008:
1) the 1.9% interest payments on the loan portfolio theory would be out the door under this scenario 2) I assumed that there would be interest accrued for the 300 billion paid by JPMC 3) We were all anxiously waiting the settlement from DB-JPM-WMIH because of the supposed loan portfolio that it would be turned over from the trusts, if I am reading this correctly does trust would have nothing to do with us but with Chase, as they bought half of the portfolio and the other was with the MBS.
Just my questions. Thanks for taking the time to present it
What you said...but...but..but JPM did not pay $299 billion, Jamie only paid $1.9 billion for everything...Jamie also said he could have paid $1 for everything instead......THE OFFICIAL TRUTH STILL HOLDS, JPM PAID $1.9 BILLION ONLY, please prove me wrong. TIA