InvestorsHub Logo

DDd myself

10/11/17 11:38 PM

#40776 RE: Slojab #40774

Since when??

lokey22

10/11/17 11:38 PM

#40777 RE: Slojab #40774

Lol did you jus put that together urself!!!??? Nice!!!

Razlin

10/11/17 11:44 PM

#40789 RE: Slojab #40774

LOL FAKE AF - are you being serious or was that a joke? amazing
SANP will hit a dollars long term

DDd myself

10/11/17 11:57 PM

#40806 RE: Slojab #40774

Post the email then don’t be a chicken dude!! Come on MOD!!! You have to be joking

Homebrew

10/12/17 12:02 AM

#40823 RE: Slojab #40774

Reminds me of a different penny-scam....emailed an alleged business partner, who replied similarly...debunking the scam's PRs.

BeamMeUpScotty

10/12/17 12:18 AM

#40865 RE: Slojab #40774

Screenshot like you do for everything else you like to screenshot thanks

The Rainmaker

10/12/17 12:23 AM

#40879 RE: Slojab #40774

Did you receive that email personally or did someone else give you that?


"Yes, we have no merger or cooperation."

Dear sirs,

I have heard that there has been a change of plans and that Canoe is no
longer doing a merge with a US OTC company called Santo Mining, led by
one Franjose Yglesias. Can you confirm this, please? Many people are
buying it's stock based solely on the news of this LOI. If it's true
that the merger is no longer on the table, someone needs to put out a
notice of this.

Regards.

From: "XXXXXXXXXXXX";
Date: 2017?10?11?(???) ??10:48
To: "admin";
Subject: verification of merger news

OTC_Buyer

10/12/17 12:24 AM

#40883 RE: Slojab #40774

From you To admin ... but yet you have international date format coming from you and not them? Part of email is botched or missing ... I need to see screenshot for accuracy.

AbleBody77

10/12/17 12:40 AM

#40905 RE: Slojab #40774

So who did you hear this from?? What’s your source??

Truenorth2016

10/12/17 1:30 AM

#41007 RE: Slojab #40774

LEGAL VISION!!! (PARTIES CANNOT DISCUSS MERGER WITH NO ONE..EMAIL IS A FAKE)

https://legalvision.com.au/mergers-acquisitions-confidentiality-agreements/

3. Permitted Disclosure
The parties to the confidentiality agreement are not permitted to disclose the information provided by the other party, except:
to ‘permitted persons’ that have been specifically set out in the confidentiality agreement; or where the confidentiality agreement expressly excludes the information (discussed below).

Permitted persons are the party’s directors, officers, employees and professional advisors
(PEOPLE ON IHUB EMAILING THEM IS NOT A PERMITTED PARTY IN WHICH THEY SHOULD TELL ANY DETAILS OF THE MERGER. THAT EMAIL IS FAKE AND THE MOST DESPARATE ATTEMPT TO STILL TRY TO GET SHARES AT .0012)

.
These parties usually need to know the confidential information to facilitate the transaction process. In circumstances where there are syndicates, co-investors or potential providers of finance (such as banks) to the transaction, the parties may also negotiate them as ‘permitted persons’.

Where the parties will exchange highly sensitive information, the disclosing party may require that each of the individual ‘permitted persons’ also execute a separate confidentiality agreement (in their personal capacity) with the disclosing party. This separate agreement further confirms that they will keep the confidential information private.

HNDRXX

10/12/17 2:14 AM

#41036 RE: Slojab #40774

Screen shot the email or give me a break. We live in the digital age

Sam'd'Mil

10/12/17 7:14 AM

#41173 RE: Slojab #40774

>>>>>$SANP Must See<<<<<

LauraT

10/12/17 8:09 AM

#41216 RE: Slojab #40774

I have worked for a few banks that merged, I am telling you that only the top executives know about the merger. The other employees....like admin and below only find out about the merger until it is finalized. Trust me.

RookieStockPicker

10/12/17 8:24 AM

#41239 RE: Slojab #40774

Well they always have the Pod biz to fall back on, if the merger deal fails:)

Beerholder

10/12/17 9:37 AM

#41472 RE: Slojab #40774

Did you just post this for responses. Should have provided a link

VortMax

10/12/17 3:03 PM

#42177 RE: Slojab #40774

cool, bitcoin $27k by Feb article...so that would translate to SANP doing about $40M per month in revenue.

Market cap fully merged here is $15M today

https://bitcoinist.com/bitcoin-price-hit-27k-february-investor-trace-mayer-thinks/

PrinceOfStocks

10/13/17 9:04 AM

#42603 RE: Slojab #40774

Wow fake

LETSWIN2020

10/13/17 9:07 AM

#42606 RE: Slojab #40774

SO NO MERGER ?? Based on the email . If so why is SANP co so vocal that something is up

LETSWIN2020

10/13/17 9:08 AM

#42607 RE: Slojab #40774

So you think if no merger happens thus goes back to triple zero 2? Other bitcoins play looks safer .

LETSWIN2020

10/13/17 9:10 AM

#42611 RE: Slojab #40774

So do you think there was some foul play here ? You think SEC is going to get involved soon because canoe denied it ?

Viewmont

10/13/17 4:35 PM

#43215 RE: Slojab #40774

I got the same response from Canoe also. My question is: What made you suspect something in the first place that you emailed Canoe for clarification. Did you read/hear that the merger wasn't going through?

VortMax

10/15/17 12:13 PM

#43707 RE: Slojab #40774

all this means is the companies are not merged yet and there is no agreement. SANP has to re work or get rid of convertible debt such that the share structure is set before Canoe can merge as they expect 35% of the O/S at that time and they don't want to own less than 35% with conversions hitting after the merge. This is what the SANP CEO is working on...

CANOE needs out of China badly, Chinese now saying they will create their own digital currency.

The Rainmaker

10/15/17 1:12 PM

#43736 RE: Slojab #40774

This is interesting notice the word cooperation seems to be a Chinese translation for a joint venture

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=134929257

ON SEPTEMBER 20, QINTANG DISTRICT AND ZHONGJI MINGYANG NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. SIGNED A COOPERATION FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT

Crazy Money

10/16/17 6:13 PM

#44533 RE: Slojab #40774

REAL SANP sticky still up :-)

OTC_Buyer

10/18/17 10:40 AM

#45614 RE: Slojab #40774

Regardless what email you got ... this should be taken off sticky as it is no longer valid and old news since we got:

CEO Tweets from China with merger still in process. (SEC approved communication and not an email.)

$SANP


Sounds like possible merger completion to me by EOW? What says you?


https://twitter.com/podwerks/status/920597716278890496

“On target to have 2nd & 3rd Qt Fins done by EOM.”

https://twitter.com/podwerks/status/920596417244221440

“Long day in China, we continue to detail the structure of the agreement with Canoe Pool. We feel that by EOW we will have a NEWS.”