1) i would suggest you aren't understanding the concept of probabilistic risk. I'll repeat again - my point isn't that this is guaranteed, but jesse keeps insisting it is known safe. And a) that is clearly false, b) as proof of that I went to two of the biggest randomized omega-3 trials and excess mortality is a clear example of cross corroboration.
2) Q: if the same AE shows up in 3/4 of trials, but is stat sig in none, do you dismiss it? A: absolutely not. It is probably real. So the fact that both Jelis and Omega show this is a meaningful risk - but certainly nowhere near 'proven' (it is, after all, only 2 trials). Again, my point is that the trial has very meaningful risk.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
