InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 75
Posts 4687
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

Re: Whalatane post# 115660

Friday, 10/06/2017 10:42:15 PM

Friday, October 06, 2017 10:42:15 PM

Post# of 426436

total mortality, 4.6% and 3.7% (P=0.18)

Come on ...get serious



1) i would suggest you aren't understanding the concept of probabilistic risk. I'll repeat again - my point isn't that this is guaranteed, but jesse keeps insisting it is known safe. And a) that is clearly false, b) as proof of that I went to two of the biggest randomized omega-3 trials and excess mortality is a clear example of cross corroboration.

2) Q: if the same AE shows up in 3/4 of trials, but is stat sig in none, do you dismiss it? A: absolutely not. It is probably real. So the fact that both Jelis and Omega show this is a meaningful risk - but certainly nowhere near 'proven' (it is, after all, only 2 trials). Again, my point is that the trial has very meaningful risk.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News