"Like I said, ruthless. But good for shareholders"
Actually you are correct. I'm sure there have been many things in the past we will never know about. Maybe we would be better off to go it alone. I'm not in a position to say because it's been pretty dark when pertinent information was concerned.
He could still be ruthless to us, shareholders, keeping the price down in order for a cheap buyout. He gets a nice position, nice salary and we are screwed.
He never showed any interest to get the shareprice higher, not even now he is looking into financing, why would that be? I don’t believe they will get all their money without having to give a bit of the company away
The implications here really turn me off. Kim's lack of concern for his prior success equates volumes to how he feels about his shareholders. Seams as ND. Gave him to much leash.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
