InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Gamesc

09/14/17 7:04 PM

#128882 RE: PatentGuy1 #128881

So your the counsel that represents the agreement? Just want to make sure everything is ironclad in your quoting. The cross license agreement covers the certain IP in the supporting document which is tied to Liquidmetal. Just don't see any agreement that prohibits Eontec with their own IP that Apple has no right to. Don't get me wrong I'm not saying your wrong or right but unless you have a confirmation from the horses mouth then points are moot.
icon url

joshuaeyu

09/14/17 7:34 PM

#128884 RE: PatentGuy1 #128881

"I respectfully submit that it is important. Whether LQMT can or cannot use Eontec's IP in the field of consumer electronic products could open or close many potential contracts."

Can u share some hyperthetical examples?

Keep in mind the agreement can be voided if both parties (Lugee left hand and right hand) agree.

icon url

rige

09/15/17 4:17 AM

#128922 RE: PatentGuy1 #128881

The direct quote only reinforces that Eontec does not have restrictions, Only Granted CIP patents have restrictions for ALL parties.

Thats CIP IP restrictions on ALL parties.

NOT Eontec IP.