By "no significant change" I am referring specifically to estimating the chance of a Short & Distort attack by evaluating the SLB rate. As long as the SLB rate does not rapidly rise to well over 100%, I think the chance is close to zero, regardless of how far below 100% SLB is, so for my purpose, there is no practical difference between 20% and 50%.
I certainly don't mind seeing the slow decline getting to less than 18% today, but in my report I want to emphasize the rapid rise and extremely high rate expected as part of a planned criminal effort to massively short and then issue preplanned negative press.
I am trying to avoid issues like when the rate rises again from 20% to 50% over a month and some people incorrectly thinking that's a bad sign, because it's not, it's just a natural consequence of a rising share price, a relatively small float, and traders trying to guess at short-term tops.
Best wishes!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
