InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 511
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/29/2015

Re: hessmessinc post# 117134

Thursday, 08/24/2017 10:29:26 PM

Thursday, August 24, 2017 10:29:26 PM

Post# of 463867
By "no significant change" I am referring specifically to estimating the chance of a Short & Distort attack by evaluating the SLB rate. As long as the SLB rate does not rapidly rise to well over 100%, I think the chance is close to zero, regardless of how far below 100% SLB is, so for my purpose, there is no practical difference between 20% and 50%.

I certainly don't mind seeing the slow decline getting to less than 18% today, but in my report I want to emphasize the rapid rise and extremely high rate expected as part of a planned criminal effort to massively short and then issue preplanned negative press.

I am trying to avoid issues like when the rate rises again from 20% to 50% over a month and some people incorrectly thinking that's a bad sign, because it's not, it's just a natural consequence of a rising share price, a relatively small float, and traders trying to guess at short-term tops.

Best wishes!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AVXL News